passtore.blogg.se - Fastrawviewer reviews

#FASTRAWVIEWER REVIEWS INSTALL#
#FASTRAWVIEWER REVIEWS UPDATE#
#FASTRAWVIEWER REVIEWS SOFTWARE#
#FASTRAWVIEWER REVIEWS CODE#

The main reason for that was speed – trying to view images from a memory card was a painfully slow and inefficient process. Previously, my workflow used to rely on importing or copying images from my memory card into my computer. 3) Culling Images Directly from Memory Card

#FASTRAWVIEWER REVIEWS SOFTWARE#

Once it is downloaded, installing the software is super easy – just follow the on-screen instructions and you will be up and running within a couple of minutes.

#FASTRAWVIEWER REVIEWS CODE#

If you have never used FastRawViewer before, go ahead and download a trial version for your PC or Mac from (and if you want to purchase, a PL-exclusive 25% discount code is provided at the bottom of this article).

#FASTRAWVIEWER REVIEWS INSTALL#

Camera updates happen even faster than Adobe’s and thankfully, I don’t have to spend upwards of $100 for all this! 2) Download and Install FastRawViewer With FastRawViewer, I no longer have to do that – I can quickly decide whether an image is a keeper or not by looking at the accurate Histogram and I have other tools to assess image quality at 1:1 pixel level view. With all other RAW viewers, I always wondered if my images were truly overexposed or not, so I had to leave the ones I doubted to be imported into Lightroom in order to see if they were salvageable.

Not only is it far faster and more efficient than any other image culling software tool I have tried to date, but it is also very accurate for evaluating RAW images. FastRawViewer SoftwareįastRawViewer changed all that.

#FASTRAWVIEWER REVIEWS UPDATE#

However, I was not happy with its slow update cycles, making it difficult to use it when shooting with a new camera, and I always knew that I was looking at embedded JPEG images instead of real RAW files when assessing files. For years, I relied on using ACDSee for image culling and I was relatively happy with its performance. Because of this, many photographers rely on third party software such as Photo Mechanic and ACDSee for basic image culling and file management. In short, as of today, Lightroom is simply an inefficient piece of software for image culling. However, even after this feature was rolled out in Lightroom CC, I still encountered a lot of slow downs when doing basic operations, such as moving between different RAW files. To make the process of culling images in Lightroom faster, Adobe updated Lightroom CC to be able to show JPEG images embedded into RAW files, so that one does not have to wait for each file to get re-rendered with the “Loading” notification that takes forever to clear. Adobe has been promising to make Lightroom faster, but its overall performance seems to only be decreasing with each new release, which is unfortunate. While I can understand that software can be slow when doing the actual editing (since it is a complicated process that might require a lot of computer resources), going through images, zooming in and out them and starring / color-labeling them should not be as painful as it currently is in Lightroom.

Importing Starred and Color-Labeled Imagesġ) Image Culling: FastRawViewer vs LightroomĪs a long time Lightroom user, I have been extremely frustrated with its lack of performance, even on the fastest PC I can build.

Culling Images Directly from Memory Card.

Image Culling: FastRawViewer vs Lightroom.

Thanks to this lightweight and powerful software, I am able to cruise through hundreds of images and select the ones that I will import and edit, while making sure that bad images never make it into my post-processing software in the first place. In order to avoid such issues and move away from Lightroom’s horrid performance, I have completely moved my image culling process to FastRawViewer. On top of that, if one has particular color, sharpness and other settings set on their camera, those settings could seriously impact JPEG previews and lie about what’s actually contained within the RAW file. In addition, looking at the embedded JPEG previews from the camera is far from ideal due to the fact that JPEG images do not contain enough information to be able to judge underexposure and overexposure.

Although Adobe updated Lightroom CC to be able to fetch embedded JPEG previews from RAW files for the sole purpose of speeding up image culling, the process is still painfully slow when going through many images. As you might already know, Lightroom is extremely slow when it comes to image culling.